Power News We love to talk!

APR 21 2017

Supreme Court refuses Reliance Power promoted Sasan Power claim for higher tariff

  • Economic Times, ET Bureau / Hyderabad
  • Created: Fri 21st APR 2017

SPL had claimed that the unprecedented, unforeseen and uncontrollable steep depreciation of the rupee was a force majeure event. The Supreme Court on Thursday refused Reliance Power-promoted Sasan Power’s (SPL) claim for higher tariff for its 4,000-MW project, located in the Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh, saying the issue was covered by an earlier judgement.

SPL had claimed that the unprecedented, unforeseen and uncontrollable steep depreciation of the rupee was a force majeure event. The apex court had last week put to rest an important issue, when it held that such unforeseen increase in the cost of coal would not be a ‘force majeure event’ under the power purchase agreements (PPAs) between power-generating companies and distributions companies. A bench led by justice PC Ghosh remanded SPL’s case back to the appropriate authority, to be decided afresh in terms of its last week’s judgment that also rejected Tata Power and Adani Power’s claim to recover compensatory tariff for additional fuel costs that they are incurring due to expensive coal imports in their plants in Mundra, Gujarat.

Sasan Power had claimed urgent need to devise a mechanism to revise the tariff for the project to factor in the impact of steep depreciation of the rupee and consequent increase in the equity contribution required to make good the increase in project cost. CERC had in February 2014 rejected SPL’s claim that the unprecedented, unforeseen and uncontrollable steep depreciation of the rupee was a force majeure event. SPL had challenged the full bench of Aptel’s judgment that held that CERC has no regulatory power under the Electricity Act to vary or modify the tariff determined through a competitive process.

It also held that the commission cannot grant any relief to SPL on account of unprecedented, unforeseen and uncontrollable steep depreciation of the rupee vis-a-vis the dollar, which as per the company, had impacted project economics. The company stated that the tribunal had erred in concluding that the tariff determined under the Act is sacrosanct and cannot be tampered with to ensure sanctity of the bidding process.

Tags

Adani Enterprise Limited Gujarat Madhya Pradesh Adani Power Ltd Singrauli NTPC Central Electricity Regulatory Commission Coal Tariff Electricity Act Reliance Power Appellate Tribunal for Electricity Power Tata Power Electricity

Related News

  • Legal view favours tariff hike, says brokerage  Read more
  • Goyal says UP misled govt on power to village  Read more
  • HERC dismisses review petition due to case withdrawal  Read more
  • Indias fastest-growing clean energy sector hits an air pocket in new worry for Modi  Read more
  • Dhundi farmers receive first payment for their 'solar crop'  Read more
  • Private power plants to CIL: Increase supplies from Korba fields  Read more
  • APTEL: Haryana,Puri Oil Mills Ltd. Vs HPPC Regarding re-determination of tariff  Read more
  • JSERC responds to JUSCOs petition regarding claim of FPPPA  Read more
  • Wind auctions destroying industry, says industry body in SC petition  Read more
  • Aptel order: Haryana discoms move SC  Read more